Descriptive Attribute	Value(s)
Date	2004-06-18
Recorder	DKP
Start Time	2014-04-02
End Time	2014-04-02
Start Time (date)	2004-06-18:09:50:00
End Time (date)	2004-06-18:10:00:00
Area or Toponym	Koutsopetria/Paleokastro
Location and Description	A fifth unit in grain stubble field; bordered on west by unit 4; on S. by low wall of rocks and building material; covered by weeds. Unit slopes down on west end then back up on east end toward REM building.
Evergreens	False
Decidiuous	False
Scrub or Phrygana	False
Maquis	False
Grass or Weeds	True
Barren	False
General Info Legal and Standard Other	False
Olives	False
Vineyard	False
Citrus	False
Apricot	False
Almonds	False
Other Orchard/grove	False
Vegetation, Small-leafed	False
Veg, Broad-leafed	False
Greens	False
Grain	False
Grain Stubble	True
Kalamboki	False
Other Vegetation	False
Dominant Vegetation Height	<= ankle
Percent Visible	40
Comments	Grain stubble w/ weed along S. end alongfg line of stones and weed over ruined building
Farm	Plowed
Soil	Compacted
Background Disturbance	Moderate
Sherd Crusting	Light
Surface Clast Size	Coarse Gravel (75-19mm)
Comments (field)	Building material forms some of surface clast FEATURES Aline of stone/rocks (1.5 m high) a building material on S. end. The remains of an ancient building form area (uncultivated) in E. end ; including in laid brick and laid mortar
Walker Spacing	10
Bearing	86.0
Direction From	South
Number of Bags	2.0
Survey Type	Standard
Digital	True
Color	False
Total object (count)	291
Sherds	122
Tiles	136
Lithics	0
Surveyunits Area Other	33
Ceramics	258
Ceramic density	8062.5
Area walked	320.0
Unit area	1600.0
Has note	This records information collected by field teams for each survey given unit. This information includes the number of different artifact classes (pottery, tile, stone, other) counted in each fieldwalker's transects, which provides the total count and density for the unit. It also includes environmental features of the unit (vegetation, soil, etc.) and the logistics of collection (date, time, location, etc.). We recorded the information on paper forms in the field at the time of survey and subsequently keyed the data into a Microsoft Access database, which we linked to a GIS plot of the survey units. We scanned the paper forms and archived a copy of the physical forms at the University of North Dakota.