Descriptive Attribute	Value(s)
Date	2004-06-22
Recorder	WRC
Start Time	2014-04-01
End Time	2014-04-01
Start Time (date)	2004-06-22:07:10:00
End Time (date)	2004-06-22:07:30:00
Area or Toponym	Paleokastro
Location and Description	Field 40+ m. No of fenced area. The field strts plowed with grain stubble then decends a short steep slope to a recently plowed field.
Evergreens	False
Decidiuous	False
Scrub or Phrygana	False
Maquis	False
Grass or Weeds	False
Barren	False
General Info Legal and Standard Other	False
Olives	False
Vineyard	False
Citrus	False
Apricot	False
Almonds	False
Other Orchard/grove	False
Vegetation, Small-leafed	False
Veg, Broad-leafed	False
Greens	False
Grain	False
Grain Stubble	False
Kalamboki	True
Other Vegetation	False
Dominant Vegetation Height	<= ankle
Percent Visible	60
Comments	Grain stubble only for Eastern anad Northern parat of field then recently plowed. Morning light impeded visibility.
Farm	Plowed
Soil	Compacted
Background Disturbance	Moderate
Sherd Crusting	Light
Surface Clast Size	Fine Gravel (19-5mm)
Comments (field)	Recently plowed area may well have been recently graded. Slope between grain stubble and plowed area dense with cobble. Cut blocks among cobble on slope b/w grain stubble and plowed area.
Walker Spacing	10
Bearing	264.0
Direction From	North
Number of Bags	2.0
Survey Type	Standard
Digital	True
Color	False
Total object (count)	136
Sherds	85
Tiles	50
Lithics	0
Surveyunits Area Other	1
Ceramics	135
Ceramic density	4218.76
Area walked	320.0
Unit area	1600.0
Has note	This records information collected by field teams for each survey given unit. This information includes the number of different artifact classes (pottery, tile, stone, other) counted in each fieldwalker's transects, which provides the total count and density for the unit. It also includes environmental features of the unit (vegetation, soil, etc.) and the logistics of collection (date, time, location, etc.). We recorded the information on paper forms in the field at the time of survey and subsequently keyed the data into a Microsoft Access database, which we linked to a GIS plot of the survey units. We scanned the paper forms and archived a copy of the physical forms at the University of North Dakota.